Being Loved

I think we all fundamentally want the same thing, which is to be loved.

This seems like such an obvious thing to say, and yet I think it’s not obvious at all, partly because we have such a vague sense of what love actually is. We use the word for so many things! I love roses, for example. I love them because they’re beautiful, and because of their scent, and even because they can be so difficult. And I do not love the hybrid teas that to me are not really roses. (You know, the roses that you get on Valentine’s Day, which have long stems and tight buds and are impossible to grow. For me, real roses are the old Gallicas and Albas and Damasks.) If only we loved people the way we love roses, or books, or houses! Books and houses we also love because they are beautiful and difficult. And yet, when we love people, we get frustrated by the difficulty . . .

I think that when we say we want to be loved, what we really mean is that we want to be understood, and accepted, and valued. Understood for who we are, and accepted and valued for that . . . And that’s where the difficulty lies, doesn’t it? Because so often when we love people, we want them to be different. We love them despite, rather than because. And yet, who among us wants to be loved despite? We want to be loved with our thorns, and even because of our thorns.

One of the reasons I’ve only been thinking about this recently is that in my family, we never talked about love. We were supposed to behave in a certain way: to become educated and cultured, to dress properly and act appropriately. The emphasis was always on our accomplishments rather than our relationships. But loving well is a sort of skill, really. Truly understanding, accepting, and valuing another human being is not an easy thing to do. Often love has something else mixed into it, a bit of dislike, a bit of disdain. That small thing will kill it, eventually. Because we can tell when someone does not truly love us, when that love is mixed with something else. We always know, even when we try to hide it from ourselves . . . Loving is something that takes honesty and courage.

It would be easy to love a rose without thorns, a book with no complicated passages, a house in which the windows did not stick in summer. A human being without old hurts or habits that displeased us. But perhaps that would not be love, just a sort of easy pleasure. Perhaps love is in the accepting, in the valuing.

Some time ago, I found a quotation from Jeannette Winterson that struck me. Here it is:

“There are many forms of love and affection, some people can spend their whole lives together without knowing each other’s names. Naming is a difficult and time-consuming process; it concerns essences, and it means power. But on the wild nights who can call you home? Only the one who knows your name.”

She’s talking about understanding: the first step in being loved is to be truly seen, and understood. You can spend your whole life in a relationship and realize that you’ve never really been understood, that the person you’ve been with has never known your name. That’s a horrible realization to have . . .

But if you can find a person who does . . . Well then, it’s as though you are no longer on a planet spinning through space. It’s as though you’ve found, in this universe that is ceaselessly in motion, a place on which to stand. Solid ground . . .

Roses

About these ads

9 thoughts on “Being Loved

  1. Thank you, Theodora, for writing this. For posting it exactly today. It landed with the precision of an acupuncture needle. May you recognize those who love you truly. May we all.

  2. Lovely. Reminds me of one of my favorite Tom Stoppard quotes from “The Real Thing: “It’s no trick loving somebody at their best. Love is loving them at their worst.”

  3. Struck especially by your comment about a deadly bit of “disdain.”

    My memory of a New Yorker article awhile back: Scientists who study facial expressions interviewed couples together, videtaped them, analyzed their expressions. Followed up several years later.

    If in initial interview you exhibited, even as a fleeting microexpression, the arrangement of facial muscles they labeled “contempt,” you were significantly unlikely to still be together on follow-up …

    Anyway, hope to see you at Boskone among your other fans. We’ll be all smiles.

    P.S. Oh! It was a Malcolm Gladwell piece, 10 years ago.

    http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2002/08/05/020805fa_fact_gladwell

    But you’d need a subscription to get to the part I mentioned above.

    • I must have read that since I subscribe to the New Yorker. I do
      know I began looking at photographs of couples and some did
      not bode well, especially one person gazing at the other, while
      the other is looking away. Lots of stories in photos. Some
      a delight and some not so.

  4. This is one of the more compassionate Game Players Guides on Loving and being Loved, to know that connection, and to be able to say ‘I can see everything from here’, wherever you are.

  5. Your comparison of how we like difficulty in some things but not in relationships rings with painful truth. I’ve seen that look of disapproval and disdain and it is the kiss of death.

  6. The “theory” behind Winterston’s quote reminds me of Ursula LeGuin’s Wizard of Earthsea… and the care one “should” take before revealing one’s true self/name to another.

  7. And I love this post. :)

    Seriously, yes. Being seen and accepted–I’ve spent my whole life longing for that, and how precious a gift that is in a world where we project onto others and complain when they’re not the way we think they should be. *guilty as charged* I’m a product of the world I live in, after all. But on the occasions I’ve found people who see me as I am and love me for it, it’s so deliciously freeing. I can let my shoulders relax and my heart open wider. What a gift!

    Imagine a whole world where everyone did that . . . ♥

Comments are closed.